"There are really only three logical explanations.

The first is that the British royals only like to visit royals, and try to stay away from republics. But Prince Charles has visited Egypt time after time, so there goes that theory.

The second possible explanation is fear – fear that any kind of royal visit to Israel would harm the UK, for example if Arab lands retaliated by cutting trade with Britain. This is silly. Prince Charles visited Jordan last year and could easily have helicoptered over for a day in Israel. Princes Andrew or Harry could have stopped by while in the Middle East as well. Given the current tacit alliance of Israel and the Gulf monarchies against Iran and ISIS, the likelihood that such visits would have harmed the UK is impossibly small.

The third possible explanation for the continuing refusal of the British royals to set foot in Israel is that either they or the Foreign Office harbor deep and undying enmity toward the Jewish state."

“There isn’t a single place in the Quran where the name Jerusalem appears,” he said. “There isn’t. Not once. You know what? Not even in a hint.” Immediately afterwards, in response to a question from a student claiming that an Arab told him there is a reference to the prophet Muhammad’s dream of Jerusalem, he said the student doesn’t understand, but “Arabs don’t understand either. Arabs imagine it. It’s amazing. You know what? Ninety percent of the Arabs don’t know what’s in the Quran. I guarantee it. We know better than them.”

“You’re saying that there is some dream. Correct. There is some commentator who explained something in the Quran through this dream. But it’s not the commentary of Rashi. It’s some legend that was appended.” The current struggle, he implies, is merely the latest example (following in the line, he says, of Antiochus, Vespasian and Hadrian, all conquerors of Jerusalem) of rebels against God trying to “bring defilement” (le-havi tum’ah — Peretz’s words) to the Temple Mount in order to thwart the Jewish mission of sanctifying the world.

It did not play down the woes and inadequacies of the current state of European affairs. On the contrary, the speech included descriptions of the “distrust of citizens towards institutions considered to be aloof, engaging in laying down rules perceived as insensitive to individual people”. But those – step forward, Nigel Farage – who thrive on channelling populist sentiment against the very essence of the European project would be fools or, more likely, cynics to claim that Pope Francis has vindicated them in any way.

Indeed, far from seeking to fuel further disenchantment with the EU, this was a strong-minded plea for a better Europe, one in tune with its founding values of “human dignity” and fundamental rights. It was no Faragiste demand to dismantle or diminish the enterprise. It was instead a call for the “confidence needed to pursue the great ideal of a united and peaceful Europe”.

No less important, it was a speech urging all Europeans to look at themselves not through the prism of narrow domestic or intra-EU disputes, but as a continent of many blessings, despite the current anxiety, not least in the eurozone. Yes, it must redefine its role and ambitions in a globalised, interconnected and more complex world. But Europe is far from over: it accounts for only 7% of the world’s population, but 25% of its GDP and 50% of its public spending.

By castigating a Europe that produces a “general impression of weariness and ageing”, a Europe which is now a “grandmother ... no longer fertile and vibrant”, the pope intended to issue a wake-up call. He aimed his criticism at the plight of the unemployed in the age of austerity and on how contemporary society pushes individuals towards an “uncontrolled consumerism”. The pope wants Europe to “rediscover the best of itself”. Some may see that as a call for miracles.

“Europe is losing relevance internally and externally,” said the report, written by Jean Pisani-Ferry, a French economist, and Henrik Enderlein, a German economist. The countries could not resign themselves, it said, “to this state of affairs.” France is grappling with low growth, high unemployment and waning competitiveness. Germany, which has performed strongly for the last decade, risks slowing if it does not step up investments in infrastructure, the report said.

The report called for a split policy mix that would rely on investment in Germany to stimulate demand, while other countries including France would pursue changes meant to bring long-term improvements to their economies, the way Germany did a decade ago when it overhauled its labor laws. Other recommendations included altering France’s framework of labor laws and creating a leaner, more effective state. Germany was urged to respond to demographic challenges by preparing for a greater influx of immigrants and women in the work force.

Most of all, the report called on Germany to step up spending, including encouraging Germans to direct nearly €2 trillion now held in normal savings accounts toward investments in domestic and foreign equities. “France is in a situation of economic weakness,” said Mr Macron, “and Germany has a problem with growth that is not all-inclusive.” Fixing the situation is urgent, he added, because “our destinies are linked."

"In the eyes of the Catholic Church, the Vatican, Jerusalem should be the capital of the three religions, the city of peace and faith. But this is a religious perspective. Achieving peace requires political negotiations. It's impossible to know in advance where the talks will lead to. The sides may agree that Jerusalem will be the capital of this or the other country, but these are issues that need to be placed on the negotiating table. It's not my place to be telling the parties how to act, but I think the negotiations need to be approached in good faith and with mutual trust. I pray to God that the two leaders will do everything to keep moving forward. That is the only way to achieve peace."

The Dutch central bank – De Nederlandsche Bank – was one of the latest to make the move. The bank announced last Friday that it moved a fifth of its total 612.5-metric-ton gold reserve from New York to Amsterdam earlier in November. It was done in an effort to redistribute the gold stock in “a more balanced way,” and to boost public confidence, the bank explained. “With this adjustment the Dutch Central Bank joins other banks that are keeping a larger share of their gold supply in their own country,” the bank said in a statement. “In addition to a more balanced division of the gold reserves...this may also contribute to a positive confidence effect with the public.”

Meanwhile, Switzerland has organized the ‘Save Our Swiss Gold’ referendum, which is taking place on November 30. If passed, it would force the Swiss National Bank to convert a fifth of its assets into gold and repatriate all of its reserves from vaults in the UK and Canada. “The Swiss initiative is merely part of an increasing global scramble towards gold and away from the endless printing of money. Huge movements of gold are going on right now,” Koos Jansen, an Amsterdam-based gold analyst for the Singaporean precious metal dealer BullionStar, told the Guardian.

Germany tried and failed to adopt a similar path in early 2013 by announcing a plan to repatriate some of its gold reserves back from the US and France. The efforts fizzled out this summer, when it was announced that Germany decided to leave $635 billion worth of gold in US vaults.

"Naimi spoke about market share rivalry with the United States. And those who wanted a cut understood that there was no option to achieve it because the Saudis want a market share battle," said a source who was briefed by a non-Gulf OPEC minister after Thursday's meeting.

Oil hit a fresh four-year low below $72 per barrel on Friday. A boom in shale oil production and weaker growth in China and Europe have sent prices down by over a third since June. "You think we were convinced? What else could we do?" said an OPEC delegate from a country that had argued for a cut. Secretary General Abdullah al-Badri effectively confirmed OPEC was entering a battle for market share.

"Oil stocks are currently in the final phase of capitulation," said UniCredit strategist Christian Stocker. Oil prices have been sliding for months, but the pain has mostly been felt by oil-services suppliers rather than majors like Royal Dutch Shell or Total. Investors maintained some faith in them based on their record of paying reliable dividends. That faith appeared to erode on Friday, when $33 billion in market capitalisation was wiped off the sector in Europe.

“The behaviour it encourages is hardly appropriate to this or any other time of year. Shoppers have been injured and assaulted. Staff have been cursed at and threatened. Chaos has been visited on stores around the country. In one incident, a mob of 200 refused to leave when managers told them they’d run out of stock. It is almost unbelievable that police had to deal with unruly shoppers. As Sir Peter Fahy, the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester, put it: ‘Our officers have enough to do already.’

Disturbing as such images might be, perhaps the real point to make about Black Friday is its sheer lack of point. Buying gifts for friends and loved-ones, the sense of preparation and imminent celebration – these are important. But there is absence of context, a mindlessness even, to what we are now seeing that makes me concerned. I have even asked myself the question: Is this the Black Day that killed Christmas?

Of course, it is only in recent years that we’ve even heard of Black Friday, and that is because it is an American phenomenon through and through. It has its roots in Thanksgiving, which itself is based on Christian celebrations for the harvest, and is associated closely with the Pilgrim Fathers. In their greed, American retailers are now opening stores on Thanksgiving itself.”

He made his comments as it was disclosed that a black hole in the EU budget could leave British taxpayers paying an extra £34 billion over six years. He said that a British exit would leave Europe “wounded” and that “everything should be done to avoid it”. “Without the United Kingdom, Europe would be wounded, even amputated – therefore everything should be done to avoid it,” he said.

“But it will survive. Without France, Europe — the European idea – would be dead.” Experts have warned that the dire state of the French economy risks creating stagnation in the eurozone that could cause another global financial crisis. Mr Cameron has pledged to renegotiate Britain’s relationship with the EU before holding an in-out referendum in 2017.

His remarks were interpreted by the market as a signal that the cartel would keep its production ceiling at 30 million barrels per day (bpd), which sent the price of crude lower. Brent crude - a global benchmark comprised of a blend of high-quality oil from 15 North Sea fields - fell 1.3 percent to $77.30 per barrel after Mr Naimi's comments, before recovering to trade flat at $78.29 by late afternoon. Brent crude has fallen 30 percent since June.

Crude traded in the US fell to as low as $74 per barrel as traders bet that Opec will allow the price to fall further amid growing signs of a global price war amid producers. "There remains little prospect of any production cut being agreed at [Thursday's] Opec meeting," said brokers at Commerzbank. "Opec will merely agree to comply better with the current production target of 30 million bpd.

American producers risk becoming victims of their own success. At today’s prices of just over $70 a barrel, drilling is close to becoming unprofitable for some explorers, Leonid Fedun, vice president and board member at OAO Lukoil (LKOD), said in an interview in London.

“In 2016, when OPEC completes this objective of cleaning up the American marginal market, the oil price will start growing again,” said Fedun, who’s made a fortune of more than $4 billion in the oil business, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. “The shale boom is on a par with the dot-com boom. The strong players will remain, the weak ones will vanish.”

At the moment, some US producers are surviving because they managed to hedge the prices they get for their oil at about $90 a barrel, Fedun said. When those arrangements expire, life will become much more difficult, he said.