The ceremonial inaugural summit at the lofty iron-and-glass Grand Palais in Paris sealed a new détente between Syria and Europe, with the Syrian and Israeli leaders also sitting at the same table for the first time. But there was no handshake and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad appeared to go out of his way to avoid Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, hiding his face behind his arm as he walked past where the Israeli leader was standing.

"Everyone will have to make an effort, as the Europeans did, to put an end to the deadly spiral of war and violence, that, century after century, repeatedly brought barbarity to the heart of civilisation," Sarkozy said in the keynote speech. Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, co-president of the summit, told the leaders they must work together to meet the challenges of food, education and health for their growing populations.

"I am sure that today is a start. I am sure that we have a long way to go and we will go a long way," he said. On a day rich in political gestures, Sarkozy hosted cordial talks with the Israeli and Palestinian leaders, capped with an effusive triple handshake and a joint news conference.

She has been hand-making Steiff toys for 18 years in Giengen, the tiny south German town where the maker of collectible teddy bears - some worth hundreds of thousands of euros - was founded over 125 years ago. Chasing lower costs, Steiff outsourced around a fifth of its production to China in 2003 but has now decided to come back because of concerns about quality and staff turnover.

Steiff is one of a small number of German firms which are swimming against the tide and leaving China, despite its cheaper workforce and a burgeoning consumer population. With fuel at record highs, some cite mounting transport costs. Production of Steiff toys, which include a distinctive long-limbed bear with a melancholy growl, will come back to Germany and other countries in Europe by the end of 2009.

A PwC study shows that companies can save up to 50 percent making their goods in China instead of Germany, but that firms often underestimate logistics costs. Around a third of companies actually incurred losses by moving production east, the study showed.

The Bishop of New Hampshire, Gene Robinson, said Dr Rowan Williams was trying to overcome deep divisions over the ordination of women and gay people. But he told the BBC: "No matter what he does he makes someone mad." Bishop Robinson is due to preach in London as the Anglican communion gathers for the Lambeth Conference.

The American preacher has been excluded from the event, held every 10 years, but has said he will be in Canterbury, where it is taking place, at the same time. He is also due to speak at St Mary's Church in Putney, south-west London, on Sunday. He said "a mistake was made" in not inviting him to the conference, but he would do whatever he could to raise the issue of gay rights "from the fringe".

Bishop Robinson said he would be doing everything he could to hold the Anglican communion together. "We need each other," he said. "We need the voices from Africa, Asia and South America. We need each other for our mutual salvation." He said he had "no doubt" that Dr Williams was doing his best to retain unity, but added: "I believe that we ought not to be fearful about the Church. The Church is not ours to win or lose. The Church is God's and God will take care of the Church."

He recalled speaking to a group of 12- to 21-year-olds who were questioning their sexuality, all of whom were familiar with a passage from the Biblical chapter Leviticus which describes homosexuality as 'an abomination'. "The Church is responsible for that - it's religious people, Muslims, Jews, Christians - and it's going to take religious voices to undo the hatred that comes from those words."

If such a messianic description really is there, it will contribute to a developing re-evaluation of both popular and scholarly views of Jesus, since it suggests that the story of his death and resurrection was not unique but part of a recognized Jewish tradition at the time.

Daniel Boyarin, a professor of Talmudic culture at the University of California at Berkeley, said that the stone was part of a growing body of evidence suggesting that Jesus could be best understood through a close reading of the Jewish history of his day. "Some Christians will find it shocking, a challenge to the uniqueness of their theology while others will be comforted by the idea of it being a traditional part of Judaism," Mr. Boyarin said.

Most Rabbis and other Jewish scholars have long argued that the death and resurrection of a Jewish Messiah was a "Christian" invention, not part of long-established Jewish thought or Biblical teaching. But a front-page story in Haaretz, a leading Israeli newspaper, just a few days ago has a lot of people asking: Are Jews really supposed to believe their Messiah will actually die and rise again, and was this really Orthodox religious thinking before the time of Jesus?

Two years ago biofuels were still being hailed as a dream solution to what was seen as one of the most urgent problems confronting mankind - our dependence on fossil fuels, which are not only finite but seemed to be threatening the world with the catastrophe of global warming.

Since then, however, the biofuels dream has been disintegrating with the speed of a collapsing card house. Environmentalists, formerly keen on this "green energy", expressed horror at the havoc it was inflicting on the world's eco-systems, not least the clearing of rainforests to grow fuel crops.

As the world suddenly faced its worst food shortage for decades, sending prices spiralling, experts pointed out that a major cause had been diverting millions of acres of farmland from food production to fuel. The damage this was inflicting on the world's poor led a United Nations official to describe the rush for biofuels as "A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY".

"If you don't have targets you don't make progress," says a Commission spokesman, adamant that the 10 per cent biofuels target cannot be altered. With the powerful US farmers' lobby, backed by President Bush, equally insistent that nothing can be done to change a policy which, according to the FAO, COULD SOON SEE NEARLY A THIRD OF US FARMLAND DIVERTED TO BIOFUELS, it seems this "crime against humanity" is set to continue.

While there are no plans to withdraw before George W Bush hands over to the new American president at the turn of the year, the decision is now expected to be made "in the first half of 2009". Only troops training Iraqi military or police and special forces are likely to stay, unless there is a sharp change for the worse. In an indication of Britain's keenness to withdraw, Des Browne, the defence secretary, emphasised last week that IRAQI TROOPS WERE BETTER ABLE TO KEEP SOUTHERN IRAQ PEACEFUL THAN BRITISH SOLDIERS.

The two sides had been negotiating a Status of Forces Agreement that would provide a legal basis for US troops to remain when a UN mandate expires at the end of the year. But in the past week Iraqi leaders have spoken of only agreeing what they call a memorandum of understanding. Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has also raised for the first time the prospect of setting a timetable for US troops to leave Iraq.

The Washington Post quoted one US official close to the negotiations as saying "WE ARE TALKING ABOUT DATES", even though Bush has previously rebuffed calls for a timetable. Iraq is a major issue in November's presidential election battle between Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama. McCain supports the Bush administration's current strategy, while Obama has called for a timetable for withdrawal.

No final decisions had been made, but up to three combat brigades in Iraq could be withdrawn, or slated for withdrawal, by the end of the administration in January, the Times said. The White House declined to discuss the withdrawals, but spokesman Gordon Johndroe told the newspaper that while Bush hoped to bring more troops home, he would await recommendations in September from General David Petraeus, the US commander in Iraq, the Times said.

The BBC was also told that China was training fighter pilots who fly Chinese A5 Fantan fighter jets in Darfur. China's government has declined to comment on the BBC's findings, which contravene a UN arms embargo on Darfur. The embargo requires foreign nations to take measures to ensure they do not militarily assist anyone in the conflict in Darfur, in which the UN estimates that about 300,000 people have died. More than two million people are also believed to have fled their villages in Darfur, destroyed by pro-government Arab Janjaweed militia.

China has chosen not to respond to the BBC's findings. Its public position is that it abides by all UN arms embargoes. China has said in the past that it told Sudan's government not to use Chinese military equipment in Darfur. Sudan's government, however, has told the UN that it will send military equipment wherever it likes within its sovereign territory.

China buys most of Sudan's oil and believes that what Sudan needs is good business partners, help with development and a solid peace process in Darfur, instead of confrontation and sanctions from the West. So when China's President Hu Jintao visited Sudan in 2007 he wrote off millions of dollars worth of debt and donated a multi-million pound interest free loan for a new presidential palace to Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir. In April last year, China's military leaders pledged to strengthen co-operation with Sudan.

As he began the longest foreign trip of his papacy, he SAID PAEDOPHILIA WAS "INCOMPATIBLE" WITH BEING A PRIEST. Australian abuse victims have said they will hold protests during his visit. Climate change will also be a leading theme at a major Catholic youth festival, World Youth Day, which the Pope is heading in Sydney. The event is expected to draw some 200,000 young Catholics to the city.

But the six-day event has been overshadowed by the launch of an investigation into sexual abuse allegations. The leader of Australia's Catholics, Cardinal George Pell, has come under criticism for his handling of a 1982 case allegedly involving the sexual abuse of 29-year-old man by a priest. The BBC's Nick Bryant in Sydney says that many victims want the Pope to directly criticise the Australian Catholic hierarchy for its handling of abuse allegations.

"It is essential for the Church to reconcile, to prevent, to help and to see guilt in this problem," Pope Benedict told reporters during his 20-hour flight to Sydney. "It must be clear... that being A REAL PRIEST IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THIS (SEXUAL ABUSE) BECAUSE PRIESTS ARE IN THE SERVICE OF OUR LORD," he said.

An independent national security blog, ArmsControlWonk.com, analyzed video footage of the launch posted by the Iranian government. It determined the missiles were identical to a version of the Shahab missile first demonstrated in Iran in 1998 that has a known range of 746 miles. In a post called "Same old Boring Shahab 3," it compared the diameter of the missile to its length and found it to be identical to the 1998 version.

Unless the Iranians built a larger missile with the same length to width ratio, dramatically improved the thrust of the rocket or decreased its internal structural mass, the missile could not achieve the range Iran claimed it did. Otherwise, it is the same knockoff of North Korea's Nodong-1, according to the blog.

Iran falsely claimed in February that it launched a two-stage missile that later analysis determined to be a one-stage Shahab missile, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists, a Washington, D.C. arms control advocacy think tank. "IRAN FREQUENTLY EXAGGERATES THE CAPABILITY OF ITS MISSILES, and it appears it is continuing that tradition with this week's tests," said David Wright, co-director of the Union's Global Security Program.

Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said the test is being taken seriously, and was an attempt to destabilize the region. "We don't believe this exercise to have been an illusion," he said Friday. Still, he added, "They were not testing new technologies or capabilities, but rather firing off old equipment in an attempt to intimidate their neighbors and escalate tension in the region. That is not the way to win the trust and confidence of the national community."

FEDERAL REGULATORS SEIZED THE BANK'S ASSETS, fearing it might not be able to meet withdrawals by depositors. It is the second-largest financial institution to fail in US history, regulators say. The failure came on a day when shares in the two biggest US home loan institutions - Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae - fell at one stage by almost 50%.

IndyMac had been struggling to raise funds and stay in business in one of the states worst hit by the US housing market slump. The bank's primary regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), said depositors had withdrawn more than $1.3bn in the past 11 days. "This institution failed today due to a liquidity crisis," OTS Director John Reich said.

What is certain is that US President George W. Bush had little part in the efforts to save the world. His decision to finally join the global fight against climate change should certainly be welcomed. Still, George W. Bush probably could have spared himself the long trip to the G-8 summit in Japan, where German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the other leaders had to pile on the pressure to get him to change his mind.

They encouraged him to finally contemplate a future without oil, and they persuaded him that the aim of reducing CO2 emissions by 2050 was possible. The US president didn't lead, he followed. THE WORLD'S ONLY SUPERPOWER HAS SELDOM LOOKED QUITE AS SMALL AS IT DID THIS WEEK. When one looks at the results of this year's G-8 Summit, one would be HARD PRESSED TO IDENTIFY ANY NEW OR EVEN COURAGEOUS IDEAS.

OTHERWISE, THERE'S TROUBLE IN PARADISE. We're facing our worst real estate meltdown since the Depression. We've got a water crisis, insurance crisis, environmental crisis and budget crisis to go with our housing crisis. We're first in the nation in mortgage fraud, second in foreclosures, last in high school graduation rates. Our consumer confidence just hit an all-time low, and our icons are in trouble - the citrus industry, battered by freezes and diseases; the Florida panther, displaced by highways and driveways; the space shuttle, approaching its final countdown. New research suggests that the Everglades is collapsing, that our barrier beaches could be under water within decades, that a major hurricane could cost us $150 billion.

We do wish you were here, because attracting outsiders has always been our primary economic engine, and our engine is sputtering. Population growth is at a 30-year low. School enrollment is declining. Retirees are drifting to the Southwest and the Carolinas, while would-be Floridians who bought preconstruction condos in more optimistic times are scrambling - and often suing - to break contracts. "THIS MAY BE OUR TIPPING POINT," says former Senator Bob Graham. "The dream is fading," says University of South Florida historian Gary Mormino. "People think Florida is too crowded, too spoiled, too expensive, too crazy, too many immigrants - name your malady."

A senior establishment figure has once more raised the question of whether sharia law should be introduced as a parallel system of justice for British Muslims. Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, the Lord Chief Justice, was following in the footsteps of the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, who in February suggested that the institutionalisation of unspecified aspects of sharia law is 'unavoidable'.

Rowan Williams gave the appearance of mere cluelessness; discussing sharia in a vague, multiculturalist manner apparently intended to project warm feelings toward British Muslims. But Lord Phillips, in attempting to move from nebulous clichés to specifics, has done far more damage than the Archbishop.

For non-Muslim authorities to propose the introduction of sharia as a legal standard for Muslims in any non-Muslim land is not only absurdly patronising and discriminatory, but also violates the canons of traditional sharia law. Sharia has always held that Muslims emigrating to non-Muslim lands are obliged to accept the laws and customs of their new homes, and must not attempt to change them in an Islamic direction. Precedent for this goes back to the counsel of the Prophet Mohammed himself, when his followers, persecuted in Mecca, sought a temporary refuge in the nearby Christian kingdom of Ethiopia.

Unfortunately, the real beliefs of British Muslims are unlikely to get sufficient attention either from non-Muslim leaders or from most of the British media. For THE ELITE, MULTICULTURALISM IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY, and sharia must be offered, notwithstanding the utter ignorance of it among the non-Muslims who advocate it. In the tabloids, sharia is identified with such punishments as the stoning of adulterers - an issue Lord Phillips ineptly tried to address. Little sensible commentary may be expected from the public prints.

Maulana Mufti Ayoob Ashrafi, a leading British Muslim traditional jurist, opposed the introduction of sharia, ASKING WHY ISLAMIC LAW MUST BE INTRODUCED IN NON-MUSLIM SOCIETIES WHEN IT DOES NOT FUNCTION IN THE MAJORITY OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES. At present, only Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan, and some remote areas of Africa and south-east Asia grant precedence to sharia over European-originated civil law - another surprise, no doubt, to most non-Muslims.

The more obvious rivals such as Russia and Europe have been joined by countries as diverse as Brazil, Israel and India, which are all launching their own space programmes. A recent report on international space competitiveness by Futron, an American technology consultancy, concluded that "systemic and competitive forces threaten US space leadership". America had failed to keep track of how quickly the "globalisation" of space was occurring, the study said.

India has followed China in announcing a manned space programme, while the European Union is expected to approve a plan in November to collaborate with Russia on a similar project. Japanese and Chinese satellites are circling the moon and will eventually be joined by ones from India and Russia.

WHEN MEN NEXT RETURNS TO THE MOON, EXPERTS BELIEVE THEY WILL BE CHINESE. The country has sent men into space twice in the past five years, with another mission scheduled for October. Mr Griffin said the Chinese had a "carefully thought-out human space flight programme" that would make them space equals with the US and Russia.