Language is a powerful, yet under-recognized, tool in the game of politics and government. It’s simple: By controlling the words people use to talk about gender identity, propagandists ultimately gain control of the narrative — and further, are able to influence the way people think and feel about gender identity. George Orwell illustrated the power of language in ‘1984’, a dystopian fiction novel about an authoritarian regime that uses linguistic manipulation to further its agenda.

From 1984:

“The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink”

Orwell, famously, was a left-winger himself — and it is truly ironic that the modern Left is using the concept of doublethink as inspiration for their game of political chess. Orwell was keenly aware of the fact that language plays a substantial role in our thoughts and opinions.

According to Academic Rights Watch, a Swedish publication that publishes its articles in Swedish, toxic feminists are rabidly demanding that Germund Hesslow, who holds dual PhDs in philosophy and neurophysiology, be fired for expressing what they claim is “anti-feminism” and “transphobia” – again, all for merely pointing out that men are different than women.

To finally see a man fully embrace his manhood and stand up to cultural terrorism in the form of toxic feminism truly is a breath of fresh air, even if it’s only happening across the pond. Perhaps Hesslow’s bold reprisal against the evil Marxist agenda taking place at his institution of employment will spark other men to do the same.

“The systematic vilification and demonization of males is part of the feminist strategy of raising women by lowering men, by convincing people that women are good and men are bad,” writes Philip Carl Salzman for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy about the true agenda of feminism. “All males, whatever their individual qualities, are reduced to a common set of evil characteristics, while all females are celebrated as sensitive, smart, and strong.”

They also believe that men can get pregnant, not all women have vaginas, and that men’s restrooms should have tampon machines. These twisted delusions are all openly advocated by Leftists who obviously don’t realize how incredibly stupid they sound to normal people.

It wasn’t long ago that society would have simply called the psych ward on these people and had them committed for treatment. Now, they run Netflix and turn every TV show and movie into a transgender propaganda production while parading children around in whored-up wardrobes as transgenders, applauding the twisted sexualization of children to the delight of Leftists.

Just remember: According to the Left, all men are bad and all women must be believed, but there’s no such thing as a man or a woman, so even their own assertions are self-contradictory. (A sure sign of an intellectually lazy framework that doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.)

It was a sickening and utterly horrifying display at GMA that tried to glamorize the sexualization of young children – and particularly young boys who, like “Desmond is Amazing,” are now being taught by conscience-seared cretins like Andrew and Wendy Napoles to believe that they’re “females” trapped inside male bodies, and thus need to dress like stereotypical drag performers at bars and strip clubs.

While the GMA co-hosts, the three adult drag queens they brought on the show as a “surprise” for “Desmond is Amazing,” and the entire audience all cheered at this nauseating display of what can only be described as pro-pedophilia propaganda, the sane world looks on and asks: Why aren’t Andrew and Wendy Napoles in prison for abusing and exploiting a child under their care?

Nobody with any sort of decency and morality will find a young boy dressed in provocative drag “cute,” as is the message now being conveyed. It’s child abuse, period, and someone needs to take a stand against it so it doesn’t continue to spread like the cancer that it truly is.

The truth of the matter is that teaching children about transgenderism, or worse, encouraging them to become transgenders, is both child abuse and sexual assault against minors. And those who do such wickedness, including Andrew and Wendy Napoles, deserve to be investigated for these crimes against innocent children.

The meeting went ahead, but Mrs Montague became so angry at her treatment that she later wrote a letter of complaint to the school, moved her five-year-old son out – and is now threatening legal action claiming victimisation. She said last night: ‘Given the nature of my complaints it was obviously a deliberate act to wear the T-shirt. I believe it was intended to belittle my views and intimidate me into silence.’

Parents were invited to join their children for a celebration of ‘the rainbow things that make them and their families special’. Mrs Montague declined and asked that her son be excused as the event ‘promoted gay lifestyles’ that conflicted with her Christian beliefs.

She says her request was refused. Mrs Montague said: ‘I thought this was completely unreasonable. Schools are supposed to be tolerant of different faiths as well as different sexualities. Within our faith we teach that a man and a woman together is what makes a family, but in my eyes the school were promoting a different type of lifestyle to the pupils. Our children were being indoctrinated with values that they do not need to taught at such a young age.’

Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said: ‘A particular agenda is being forced on to children inside school gates and parents are being given no means to ensure that they are being taught in line with their religious and philosophical beliefs.’

She also found out that teachers had given her daughter – who wanted to identify as male – a boy’s name and referred to her using male pronouns at school without her parents’ knowledge. Lisa, who says her daughter is a lesbian and only claimed to be transgender after being bullied for being gay, also demanded teachers stop treating her as a boy and revert to using her girl’s name.

At a meeting at the school in January Lisa was told her attempt to find an alternative therapist was akin to ‘conversion therapy’ – a psychological practice of trying to change a person’s sexual orientation. Days later Lisa received a ‘terrifying’ email from Child and Adult Services stating that her daughter was deemed to be at risk. Further warnings said the teenager could be placed in a ‘child protection plan’. ‘I was reduced to tears because we were being treated like criminals when we were trying to protect our daughter,’ Lisa said.

‘My daughter felt rejected as a lesbian, so she turned to the internet for answers and was sucked in by these social media sites selling her a lie that there are young people born in the wrong body.’ However, after emails between Lisa and a social worker, during which the mother-of-one explained her concerns about the NHS therapy her daughter had received, the local authority closed the case. The school has also reverted to using the teenager’s real name.

The word 'womxn' in the Urban Dictionary is described as: 'A spelling of "women" that is a more progressive term that not only sheds light on the prejudice, discrimination, and institutional barriers womxn have faced, but to also show that womxn are not the extension of men (as hinted by the classic Bible story) but their own free and separate entities. More intersectional than "womyn" because it includes trans-women and women of color.' 

Mrs May will reportedly take personal responsibility for persuading voters to back her deal and will warn her party to put aside divisions and listen to the people, who she will claim are fed up with Brexit and want to “move on”. If MPs don’t support the deal, negotiated over 18 months and signed off on Sunday in Brussels, it will cause further “division and uncertainty”, Mrs May is set to tell Parliament.

After the meeting in Brussels this weekend, Mrs May appealed for support before the “significant” vote in parliament. “On it will depend whether we move forward together into a brighter future or open the door to yet more division and uncertainty,” she said. “The British people don’t want to spend any more time arguing about Brexit. They want a good deal done that fulfils the vote and allows us to come together again as a country.”

Critics have argued Mrs May’s deal could lock the UK to EU rules and institutions for decades to come, and over the weekend, French premier Emmanuel Macron claimed that the “Irish backstop” would be used to keep the UK in customs union if French ships are not allowed access to UK waters.

Friedman confirmed a report last week about a top-level meeting to discuss the content and timing of the peace plan. The meeting was “very productive,” Friedman said, noting that participants “discussed the president’s vision for comprehensive peace between Israel and the Palestinians,” but not offering further details. He did lament, however, that media reports of the meeting “have been wildly inaccurate.”

The peace plan will be released when the administration thinks it has “maximized its potential for acceptance, execution and implementation,” the ambassador went on. “Our timing, our strategy and our messaging is — and will be — entirely our own. Moreover, Mr Kushner, Mr Greenblatt and I are of one mind in terms of how best to proceed,” he continued. “Those anonymous ‘experts’ who purport to speak for the administration on this issue are ill-informed and mistaken.”

It doesn’t describe that “emergency,” but uses it to argue that ‘defense’ spending needs to soar and all other spending by the Government — especially for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other “entitlements” — needs to shrink, and/or recipient beneficiaries of those programs need to pay more, and taxes need to increase, so that this “emergency” can be dealt with. They say that the weapons-manufacturers and soldiers need more money, and that this military requirement is an “emergency” but other federal spending is not.

The Executive Summary says: Rivals and adversaries are challenging the United States on many fronts and in many domains. America’s ability to defend its allies, its partners, and its own vital interests is increasingly in doubt. If the nation does not act promptly to remedy these circumstances, the consequences will be grave and lasting. The document strongly urges expansion of the US regime’s policing of the world, in the interests of America’s international corporations. 

The leftist position on this topic is so divorced from reason, so utterly indefensible, that they cannot even explain their own view, let alone defend it against an intellectual challenge. They can only issue assertions and then shout ad hominems at anyone who refuses to immediately believe and adopt their philosophy wholesale. To demonstrate this fact, here are five very basic questions that any proponent of "transgenderism" and gender fluidity should be able to answer easily, but cannot:

1) How precisely does a biological male come to the conclusion that he is really a woman?

2) If he arrives at this conclusion based on the fact that he "feels like" a woman, how does he know what it feels like to be a woman?

3) What exactly is a female feeling?

4) Even if it made sense to speak of female feelings and female thoughts, and even if it were possible for a man to know for certain that he is experiencing those feelings and thoughts, in what objective sense do those feelings and thoughts make him a woman rather than simply a feminine man?

5) But the Left tells us that gender is a social construct. They reject the idea that women must necessarily have any particular feeling or thought or taste or preference.

If gender is indeed an artificial construct and our physical features have no bearing on our identity as "man" or "woman," then what ...is a woman? A woman, in that case, is not defined by her feelings, thoughts, ideas, preferences, or her body, reproductive organs, chromosomes, DNA, etc. So what is she defined by? If he isn't defined by anything, then how does it make sense to call yourself a woman? Isn't that like calling yourself a whooziwhatsit or a thingamadoodle? Isn't "woman" now a term empty of all objective meaning?

I have never heard any leftist offer a satisfactory answer to these questions. Rarely have I seen anyone even attempt an answer. That's because there is no answer. They are proposing square circles. They are insisting on something that is not only scientifically but logically impossible. All they can do with such an insistence is insist it. Only logical propositions can be explained and defended. So, they don't bother. And why should they? If they can make their ideas mandatory, it doesn't matter that the ideas are absurd.

It is not just teens. “The sexual behavior trends shown in our analyses are similar to those found in other high-income countries such as the United Kingdom, France, and Sweden.” The writers and most of the researchers are women. Men avoid this hot zone, which offers the potential for career death by saying something deemed sexist. The women writers speak of “people” and “teens”, but they quote almost exclusively women – and discuss (with exceptions) only women’s perspectives.

This blinkered viewpoint goes further. The women, of course, don’t consider that these trends might be caused by changes in women’s behavior. Men that show an interest in young women are often told by women that this is “pervy”, although marriages with the husband 7 to 10 years older than the wife was once commonplace.

We are like monkeys in the control room of a nuclear power plant, spinning the dials. We are confident that no testing or experimentation is required. Fourth wave feminism is a movement to make normal behavior into misbehavior, alienating us from our natures. It will inflect damage to society on a scale we cannot imagine today. The shift to a post-marriage – even post-relationship society – has just begun.

Bet on a lot more loneliness in America, as fewer people bond together. Since the family is the primary tie of people to society, bet on much more alienation. Since the family motivates men to work hard, expect more dropouts (the “missing men” in the job stats). Since relationships and family provide meaning to many people’s lives, bet on much more use of drugs – and more deaths from drug overdoses. We are drifting thoughtlessly to a dark future for America.