On February 3, 2016, Powell reported on the lethal attack by three Palestinian terrorists on two Israeli policewomen. Powell stated:

“…Now, these attacks have been seen as lone wolf attacks. They are not driven by a militant group but by the frustration of individual Palestinians. They say this frustration stems from the lack of prospects for an independent Palestinian state and the growth of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. It fuels this wave of violence…”

Powell is offering conjecture, not fact. And his conjecture is inconsistent with what is known about the events and incitement to violence by Palestinian officials that led to the recent wave of attacks and what Fox News has previously reported.

Powell's skewed reporting on the violence in Israel and the West Bank is habitual. As CAMERA documented in November 2014, Powell placed equal blame on Israelis and Palestinians during another brief wave of lethal Palestinian attacks on Israelis. He described the unprovoked attacks on Israeli civilians as a "tit-for-tat."

When will Fox recognize that Powell is unable to restrain himself from injecting his personal biases into his reporting? Powell is spreading his misinformation to the Fox News audience and undermining the reputation Fox News has sought to establish as a reliable and fair source of news on the Middle East.

In a letter to JR Simplot Co, the makers of the GM potato, the FDA said that it wasn’t substantially different in composition or safety from other products already on the market, and doesn’t require any more stringent vetting.

However, several studies carried out by scientists independent of the biotech industry have revealed glaring differences between GMOs and their non-GMO counterparts. This makes a mockery of the regulatory principle of ‘Substantial Equivalence’ which has facilitated approvals of GMOs with practically no protection for public health and the environment.

But the approval doesn’t come without consumer backlash; the new GMO potato represents yet another reason we need to adopt GMO labeling across the country. Both McDonald’s and Frito Lay have said they will not purchase GM potatoes to pass on to their customers, largely due to consumer backlash.

"The question is not could Britain succeed outside the European Union, it is how will we be most successful? How will Britain be most prosperous? How will we create the most jobs? How will we have the most influence on the rules that shape the global economy and affect us? How will we be most secure?"

"And I've always said that the best answers to those questions can be found within a reformed European Union. But let me say again, if we can't secure these changes I rule nothing out." Mr Cameron also said he will never say the EU is "fixed", even if the changes are secured. He went on: "There'll be many things that remain to be reformed and Britain would continue to lead the way."

Mr Cameron added: "So if we stay, Britain will be in there keeping a lid on the budget, protecting our rebate, stripping away unnecessary regulation and seeing through the commitments we have secured in this renegotiation."

"Ensuring Britain truly can have the best of both worlds, in the parts of Europe that work for us and out of those that don't - in the single market, free to travel around Europe, part of an organisation where cooperation on security and trade can make Britain and its partners safer and more prosperous, but with guarantees that we will never be part of the euro, never be part of Schengen, never be part of a European army, never be forced to bail out the eurozone with our taxpayers' money and never be part of a European superstate."

Eurosceptics were quick to denounce the plan. “Is that it then, Mr Cameron?” asked the anti-Brussels Daily Mail newspaper. Liam Fox, the senior Conservative Eurosceptic, said it did not “even come close to the fundamental changes promised to the public”. Downing Street can justifiably claim that the prime minister has achieved many of his original negotiating goals. Eurosceptics counter that this it is only because the things he wanted were so trivial in the first place.

Even in areas identified as successes by Mr Cameron’s team there are plenty of caveats that will be mercilessly picked apart between now and an EU heads of government summit on February 18-19. One EU diplomat compared the next stage to “open heart surgery”.

Conservative Eurosceptics poured scorn on David Cameron’s attempt to renegotiate Britain’s relationship with Europe, saying his outline deal with Brussels did not go anything like far enough, writes Kate Allen. Steve Baker, leader of the Conservatives For Britain group, called the document an “in-at-all-costs” deal about “staying in a substantially unreformed EU” which “looks funny, smells funny”. “This deal does not end the supremacy of EU law or allow us to control the benefits system as we see fit or determine migration policy for ourselves,” he said.

Liam Fox, a leading figure in the Leave camp who fought Mr Cameron for the Conservative party leadership in 2005, said: “The very limited set of demands from our government have been watered down by the EU in every area. None of these changes even come close to the fundamental changes promised to the public,” he added, claiming that the deal constituted “empty promises from the EU that are not even backed up in a treaty”.

"What it means is more Europe with an EU army, EU accession of Turkey, and EU primacy over our laws and our courts. Well Cameron wanted a four year ban on migrant benefits, he didn't even ask for a restriction on the open door movement that we have to nearly half a billion people. We can in the first few months or year stop benefits, but from years 2, 3 and 4 bring them up to the current levels. This is pretty weak stuff."

"Fundamental treaty change, which is what the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary talked about. A change in our relationship, reform of the European institutions and Donald Tusk, the President of the European Council, in the first sentence of this document says that all the principles on which the European Union was founded have been respected. The treaties stay intact."

"There is no fundamental reform, there's some fiddling around the edges on migrant benefits. I absolutely predict that the effect of this will not be to reduce the numbers coming to Britain but given the huge increase that is coming to a minimum wage, to our living wage, even more people will come. I suspect the European Council will approve this document, they are giving us nothing."

“David Cameron has agreed to a virtually unworkable system which still sends benefits money to families of EU workers abroad and which doesn’t even put a stop to immediate benefits payable to EU workers, opting instead for a ‘graduated’ system which will still pay some benefits at once. It is a pipe dream to put total reliance on 55% of the other EU countries agreeing with him. He is now their hostage if he agrees to that.” Thurrock MEP Tim Aker said "The choice couldn't be clearer. We must leave the EU now to regain control of our laws, borders and sovereignty. To stay in risks too much."

The agency, the International Maritime Organization, said Tuesday that it had received a notification from the North Korean authorities of a multistage rocket launch between the hours of 7 am and noon local time, on an as-yet unspecified day between February 8 and 25. An agency spokeswoman, Natasha Brown, said North Korea’s notification described the payload as an Earth observation satellite it called Kwangmyongsong, which translates as Lodestar.

If the launch goes as planned, the notification said, the rocket’s first stage will fall in waters off the west coast of South Korea, and the second stage in waters east of the Philippines. The notification came after warnings to North Korea advising against a launch from the United States and allied nations, which consider such a step a cover for developing an intercontinental ballistic missile that can deliver a nuclear bomb. Under a series of United Nations Security Council resolutions, North Korea is barred from developing nuclear weapons or ballistic missile technologies.

This unity was pronounced as: “all in each place who are baptized into Jesus Christ and confess him as Lord and Saviour are brought by the Holy Spirit into one fully committed fellowship, holding the one fully committed fellowship, holding the one apostolic faith, preaching the one Gospel, breaking the one bread, joining in common prayer, and having a corporate life reaching out in witness and service to all and who at the same time are united with the whole Christian fellowship in all places and all ages, in such wise that ministry and members are accepted by all, and that can act and speak together as occasion requires for the tasks to which God calls his people”.

The Roman Catholic Church around this period of the early 1960’s was not left out. The Church was about to enter into the ecumenical movement officially but was stopped by Pope Pius XI for fear of “religious indifferentism”. The emergence of the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) brought in a new Catholic thrust… Pope John XXIII came up with a special decree on Ecumenism… This made the Catholic Church a prominent participant in the modern ecumenical movement.

To set the scene, in the episode “Wedding Day Sale,” Glenn, the religious store manager, enlists the help of Mateo, a gay employee, in creating a special gay wedding section. Glenn explains, “I just want everyone who comes into this store to feel accepted,” which is a fine sentiment and a great way for a manager to treat his customers. But it leads to this discussion about Jesus being pro-gay marriage, pro-gay adoption, and maybe was even gay himself – a statement that FINALLY makes Glenn uncomfortable.

Lefty Hollywood loves poking its finger in the eye of Christians and disrespecting their religion. They think they're being edgy and provocative, but instead they're being lame and predictable. Hey Hollywood, you want to REALLY be edgy and provocative? Try airing a scene that has characters saying Muhammad would be pro-gay marriage, pro-gay adoption, and might even be gay. Let's see how that goes!

For example, scientists would have to perform extensive preliminary research in the laboratory and with animals to try to make sure it is safe. And then researchers should initially try to make only male babies, because they would be incapable of passing their unusual amalgamation of DNA on to future generations.

Critics of the research, meanwhile, say the number of women who could benefit from the experiments is so small that it's not worth crossing a line that's long been considered off-limits — making genetic changes that could be passed down for generations.

"The possibility of what you could call 'mission creep' is very real," says Marcy Darnovsky, executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, a watchdog group based in Berkeley, California. "People are talking about going forward not just with this but with the kind of genetic engineering that will produce outright genetically modified human beings."

Once that happens, Darnovsky says, "I think you get into a situation of where some people are genetically enhanced and other people are the regular old variety of human being. And I don't think that's a world we want to live in."

Zika virus has been linked to a birth defect called microcephaly, which causes babies to be born with brain damage and unusually small heads. Brazil has been labeled the “epicenter” of the Zika virus outbreak, with more than a million cases reported there. Perhaps not coincidentally, Brazil is also the site where the GM mosquito project was carried out – and it involved the same strain of mosquito said to be responsible for the spread of the virus.

It’s easy to see where the Zika virus crisis might fit in with Bill Gates’ admitted depopulation agenda. Not only are babies being born nearly brain-dead, but now women throughout Latin America are being urged not to have children during the next two years. Coincidence?

And in the latest Zika news, GM mosquitoes are now being considered for use in fighting the further spread of the virus. And of course, researchers are scrambling to develop a vaccine.