In an interview with PinkNews, the LGBT website, he added that the growth of academies and free schools was allowing individual schools to act as “judge and jury” to decide what they want to teach on such issues. Mr Burnham, who is from a Roman Catholic background, disclosed that he had gone through deep rifts with members of his own family after he become one of the first prominent MPs to publicly support same-sex marriage.

“I have been repeatedly at odds with the Catholic church for all of my time as an MP,” he said. “I have always been going against what they were saying, and that is challenging. That creates a personal challenge – I've been at odds with my own family, and that has been to some personal cost at times in terms of relationships with people.”

Obama has been a public supporter of same-sex marriage since 2012. In an interview with Robin Roberts of Good Morning America that year, he said that he personally felt that gay couples should be allowed to marry. He's since come out with more a forceful stance on the issue, and addressed the issue during his second inaugural speech.

"Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law, for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well," he said, according to the New York Times.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the principle dissent, joined by Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Clarence Thomas. They argued that the court was overstepping its bounds by taking an action better left to the democratic process. “This Court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us,” Roberts wrote. “In short, our Constitution does not enact any one theory of marriage. The people of a State are free to expand marriage to include same-sex couples, or to retain the historic definition.”

Justices Scalia, Thomas and Samuel Alito wrote additional dissents. Scalia said he wrote “to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy.” “Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nice lawyers on the Supreme Court,” Scalia warned. “The five Justices who compose today’s majority are entirely comfortable concluding that every state violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification and Massachusetts’ permitting of same-sex marriage in 2003.”

Sections of the TPP published by Wikileaks have revealed the treaty’s vast influence over multiple areas including individual rights, internet freedom and even the rule of law itself. Unelected corporate boards and the President can now wield unprecedented control over almost every aspect of human activity. “If you read, write, publish, think, listen, dance, sing or invent; if you farm or consume food; if you’re ill now or might one day be ill, the TPP has you in its crosshairs,” Wikileaks’ Julian Assange wrote.

Secret TPP chapters regarding immigration also grant President Obama an even greater ability to erode the country’s Southern border. “Obama will be able to finalize all three of the Obamatrade deals, without any Congressional input…” notes Breitbart. The TPP, which covers 12 countries and more than 40% of the world’s economy, will place North America under the same global government structure as the European Union, where laws are increasingly crafted outside of public influence.

Vatican Foreign Minister Paul Gallagher and his Palestinian counterpart, Riad al-Malki, signed the treaty at a ceremony inside the Vatican. Israel expressed disappointment when the Vatican announced last month that it had reached final agreement with the "State of Palestine" on the treaty regulating the life of the Catholic Church in the Palestinian territories.

It repeated that regret in a Foreign Ministry statement Friday, saying the move hurt peace prospects and would discourage the Palestinians from returning to direct negotiations. It warned that it would study the agreement "and its implications for future cooperation between Israel and the Vatican."

The Germans are not alone in their support for strengthened defense cooperation and even a European army. The majority of parliamentary factions also back them.

At the same time, the German parliament insists on maintaining full autonomy in its decisions regarding the deployment of Germany’s armed forces. However, if one wants to set up joint defense units, states have to give up sovereignty. They would have to agree on mutual dependency long before deploying any troops. Although the government and parliament could refuse the deployment of their capabilities, they would not be able to veto the overall mission.

Britain has agreed to become a founding member of the China-backed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, despite America's concerns. The $50 billion AIIB has been feted by Beijing as a way of financing regional development, and is seen as a potential rival to US-based institutions such as the World Bank.

"There will be times when we take a different approach (to the United States)," a spokesman for David Cameron said, referring to the decision to join the bank. "We think that it's in the UK's national interest." Chancellor George Osborne echoed the Prime Minister's view. “Forging links between the UK and Asian economies to give our companies the best opportunity to work and invest in the world’s fastest growing markets is a key part of our long-term economic plan,” he said.

On Friday, the blue-chip CSI 300 index plummeted 7.8 percent, while the smaller Shenzhen Composite declined by the same margin to post its lowest close since May. In the past two weeks around $1.2 trillion (£600 billion) has been wiped off the value of Chinese listed companies since the market reached its peak on June 12.

Since the beginning of the year China’s stock market bubble has inflated to epic proportions as speculators piled in by borrowing money to buy stocks in ever larger volumes. At the beginning of the year, the value of outstanding loans used by securities firms to fund investment had swollen to exceed $260 billion. By the beginning of this month that figure had grown to $364 billion.

Many of those investments are now worth less than the value of the loan as more traders exit the market in order to cover margin calls on their outstanding debts. Given the scale of leveraging that underpins both the Shanghai and Shenzhen indexes, few experts are predicting that the current stocks rout will end until more of this debt is washed out of the system.

Greece's creaking banking system is now facing the prospect of a devastating run on its assets after Athens failed to give ground on an ultimatum presented by its paymasters. In a three-hour aborted session of finance ministers, both sides failed to agree on a final version of a deal to report back to European leaders convening for a two-day summit.

At the summit, which was billed as David Cameron's bid to kick-start his EU renegotiation ploy, leaders such as Germany's Angela Merkel and Holland's Mark Rutte, reportedly told Alexis Tsipras to "shut up" over his pleas for a reprieve over the dinner table. Negotiations will now spill over into the weekend, raising fears that capital controls will need to be imposed as early as Monday in the absence of a deal to stave off a debt default on June 30.

Amid the acrimony, Ms Merkel accused Greece of taking "regressive" steps, warning that Berlin would not be "blackmailed" by the debtor's demands, she told her MEP's. “We have not made the necessary progress. In some areas one even gets the impression that we have moved backwards," said Ms Merkel. The German premier is pushing for a solution by Sunday at the latest, to ensure markets do not spiral into chaos on Monday morning.

The Greeks have regularly said they don’t have enough money to make an imminent payment right up to the point at which they have handed over more cash. The various creditors have regularly said they will not give Greece any more money right up to the point at which they have afforded the country just a smidgen more fiscal latitude.

Equally, the red lines on either side have always been somewhat blurry. The Greek prime minister Alexis Tsipras has, for example, repeatedly refused to countenance cutting pensions, but his latest proposals have suggested increasing the retirement age and raising contributions. The creditors have repeatedly refused to countenance a debt write-off, but they have floated the possibility of restructuring loans to reduce the rate of interest and increase the amount of time Greece has to pay up. You say tom-a-to, I say tom-ah-to.

The whole sorry spectacle is deeply unedifying – ’twas ever thus. The upside is that a “Grexident”, one of the uglier neologisms born out of the protracted negotiations, is also a misnomer: the various deadlines and rules are too flexible (regardless of what anyone says) to accidentally trip Greece into default and cause the country to stumble out of the eurozone.

If Greece goes, somebody somewhere will definitely get the blame for pushing it. None of those involved – not the Greek government, the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank nor the eurozone politicians and technocrats – wants that to be them. Hence why the game of chicken has turned into one of pass-the-parcel.

June 29: Recalling the Bundestag

Under national laws, any extension must be approved by a handful of eurozone parliaments — most importantly the German Bundestag, which is due to be on recess next week. Although the centre-right bloc of Chancellor Angela Merkel has become increasingly restless over Greece, they are likely to back any extension she endorses — even if they have to return from holiday to do so. But the vote must be held either the 29th or 30th, giving legislators precious little time to review the agreement.

June 30: Expiration date

The date Greece’s bailout expires and when it is due to repay €1.5 billion in loan repayments to the International Monetary Fund. Even if a deal is in place before the deadline expires, it remains unclear how — or whether — Greece will find the money to pay the IMF, since there is not enough time for Athens to pass all the economic reforms necessary to gain access to any of the €7.2 billion in bailout funds.

But credit rating agencies have said that non-payment to the IMF is not formally a default, and the ECB is unlikely to decide it means Greece is bankrupt. If it did, much of the collateral used by Greek banks to obtain their emergency loans — particularly Greek government bonds — would be worthless. That would mean the ECB having to cut off emergency funding, probably forcing a Grexit.

July 1: The extended bailout

If a deal is reached and all the legislative approvals are voted in time, Greece’s bailout would be extended for anywhere from three to nine months. For the EU’s portion of the bailout, the extension is expected to include a bit more money as well. Another €1.5 billion in profits on Greek bonds held by the ECB — which are to be refunded to Athens as part of a deal reached three years ago — come online July 1. All told, that’s about €16 billion in EU aid available to Athens as part of the extension. The length of the extension will depend largely on how long officials determine that money can last. There is also about €16.4 billion remaining in the IMF’s portion of the bailout, which runs through March 2016.

July 20: Drop-dead deadline

This may be the real drop-dead deadline: the date two bonds totalling €3.5 billion fall due to the ECB. Although credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s said recently it would not consider a failure to pay these bonds a full default — it said only non-payment on bonds held by private creditors constitutes a default in their books — it would be virtually impossible for Greece to survive inside the eurozone if it defaulted on the ECB.

That means Greece must legislate for and implement the entire reform programme before this date so that it ensures it has bailout funding in time to repay the ECB. Another €3.2 billion is due for two more bonds held by the ECB on August 20.

When many people hear the word “derivatives”, they tend to tune out because it is a word that sounds very complicated. And without a doubt, derivatives can be enormously complex. But what I try to do is to take complex subjects and break them down into simple terms. At their core, derivatives represent nothing more than a legalized form of gambling. A derivative is essentially a bet that something either will or will not happen in the future. Ultimately, someone will win money and someone will lose money.

There are hundreds of trillions of dollars worth of these bets floating around out there, and one of these days this gigantic time bomb is going to go off and absolutely cripple the entire global financial system. Back in 2002, legendary investor Warren Buffett shared the following thoughts about derivatives with shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway…

“The derivatives genie is now well out of the bottle, and these instruments will almost certainly multiply in variety and number until some event makes their toxicity clear. Central banks and governments have so far found no effective way to control, or even monitor, the risks posed by these contracts. In my view, derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal.”

Those words turned out to be quite prophetic. Derivatives have definitely multiplied in variety and number since that time, and it has become abundantly clear how toxic they are. Derivatives played a substantial role in the financial meltdown of 2008, but we still haven’t learned our lessons. Today, the derivatives bubble is even larger than it was just before the last financial crisis, and it could absolutely devastate the global financial system at any time.

We cannot afford for these “too big to fail” banks to actually fail. Even the failure of a single one would cause a national financial nightmare. The “too big to fail” banks that I am talking about are JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo. When you total up the exposure to derivatives that all of them currently have, it comes to a grand total of more than 278 trillion dollars. But when you total up all of the assets of all six banks combined, it only comes to a grand total of about 9.8 trillion dollars. In other words, the “too big to fail” banks have exposure to derivatives that is more than 28 times the size of their total assets.

Our financial system has been transformed into the largest casino in the history of the planet. For the moment, the roulette wheels are still spinning and everyone is happy. But sooner or later, a “black swan event” will happen that nobody expected, and then all hell will break loose.

Attacks on churches, schools and religious groups are deliberately horrific, designed to generate maximum publicity. Yet these grievous human rights abuses, which in some areas have amounted to genocide, have not been met with a clear and coordinated response from the international community. In the context of the wider geopolitical power struggles that created the breeding ground for this persecution, these suffering populations become collateral damage.

Pope Francis has repeatedly condemned the "complicit silence" of the international community, which allows this brutal persecution to continue. This is an issue that concerns everyone. Where the right to freedom of conscience and religion is denied, other serious human rights abuses will follow. If we open our hearts and minds to hear the voices of the victims, we cannot fail to see that the denial of their dignity wounds all of humanity.

The female farmer, who did not want to be named, had gone out to check her flock of 100 ewes and 90 lambs on Midsummer's Day morning. The corpse had been dragged around to leave an intricate bloody spiral on the grass in the remote Teign Valley on Dartmoor in Devon. The farmer says it the latest in a line of attacks by devil worshippers across Devon and Cornwall - mostly carried out on lonely moors at night.

On April 18, the night of a full moon, the same farmer found the severed leg of a lamb. She said she does not want to be named for fear of reprisals, adding: "We get enough hassle with dogs worrying sheep - we don't need devil worshippers as well."

The UK must consider whether the country’s influence could be best exerted individually, aligning it with that of Europe only when it is in Britain’s own interests, and whether this could be done without compromising the UK’s international standing or energy security. By leaving the EU, Britain would see more freedom of action for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, retain its seat on the United Nations Security Council, retain membership of key international bodies, and be able to work with the EU as it sees fit.

The EU has developed a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). It began as informal cooperation but is now incorporated in the Treaty structure itself, an integral part of the EU. Change has been rapid, and the ambition for further EU action is deep.

In continuing to establish its own foreign policy identity, the EU now constitutes a growing threat to British influence. This is particularly felt in international institutions, where increasingly the EU corporately occupies the place and function once filled by British diplomats. The establishment of an EU diplomatic corps, the EEAS, in parallel to British diplomats, can only harm the UK’s lead over its competitors, as the central importance of EU delegations grows while the FCO faces inevitable calls for cuts.