Ianicelli is charged with tampering with a jury, a felony in Colorado that carries a minimum bond of $5,000. He was charged by the Denver District Attorney for seven counts of tampering, and has since bailed out of jail. Ianicelli was in the second day of a planned three-day outreach to educate jurors entering the courtroom about the power of jury nullification.

He was handing out fliers when he was arrested. His goal was to inform potential jurors about a vital, centuries-old function of juries. Though Kirsten Tynan (of the Fully Informed Jury Association) acknowledged that under some circumstances nullification activism is not legally permissible, it appears Ianicelli was within his rights. He is due back in court on August 11 to face his victimless felony charges.

It is more than alarming that a man attempting to facilitate and strengthen the judicial process is punished with the full force of the law — the very thing Ianicelli sought to educate jurors about. As Harlan F Stone, the 12th Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court said in 1941, “The law itself is on trial quite as much as the cause which is to be decided.” When the justice system refuses to allow jurors to be aware of their rights, let alone exercise them, the country’s entire system of “law and order” is called into question.

And did you know that the radical new sustainable development agenda that is being launched by the United Nations in September includes a goal of providing access to abortion services to every single woman on the entire planet by the year 2030? The things that you are going to read about in this article are very disturbing. The demonic population control agenda of the New World Order is greatly advancing, and Barack Obama and the US government are at the tip of the spear.

No matter which political party has been in power, the US government has been giving hundreds of millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood year in and year out. They just kept on doing this even though they knew that Planned Parenthood was harvesting body parts from aborted babies and selling them to medical researchers to be used in sick and twisted experiments. It was common knowledge that this was happening in the abortion industry, but nobody was really talking about it. Thankfully, a series of undercover videos has been released recently which has caused this horrific practice to make headlines all over the planet.

It is hard to even fathom that people could be so evil. We are talking about a level of depravity along the lines of a Josef Mengele. Now it is all out in the open, most Americans don’t seem too concerned about it. Barack Obama has already pledged to stop all attempts to defund Planned Parenthood, and he is very proud to stand shoulder to shoulder with them.

As I mentioned above, the United Nations is launching the 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development in September. The Pope is actually traveling to New York to deliver the speech that will kick off the conference where this agenda will be publicly unveiled. But what most people don’t realize is that population control is at the very core of this new agenda.

The global elite want all of us to believe that climate change is the greatest threat that humanity is facing, and that one of the best things that we can do to fight climate change is to reduce population growth. Each one of us has a “carbon footprint”, and so in their view the less of us that are running around the better. Ultimately, they would like to stabilize the size of the human population of the planet at around 500 million people.

That would mean a reduction of more than 90 percent from the current level. This is something that the global elite talk about and write about all the time, and nobody should underestimate their sick obsession with “saving the planet”. So precisely how will they achieve their goal of getting rid of so many of us?

In a fourth video released from the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), Planned Parenthood personnel can be seen sifting through aborted baby parts allegedly to show what parts can be salvaged and sold. These mice or rats are created by removing a human organ such as a kidney from a dead human baby and implanting it into a mouse or rat for the purpose of medical research.

As reported in Live Science, Duke University medical student Eugene Gu co-authored a study released in January in which he said, “Our long-term goal is to grow human organs in animals, to end the human donor shortage.” According to the report, Gu is also founder and CEO of Redwood, California biotech company Ganogen, Inc.

On the one side are those liberal theologians who see the biblical texts as simply the words of men trying to interpret the mind of God. In their minds, the meaning of these words are highly fluid and subject to change as humanity evolves and “progresses.” But conservative scholars take a different approach. They look at the grand sweep of human history and see foreboding examples of whole societies wiped away mainly because of two things: their sacrificing of children to idols and their deviant sexual practices.

Carl Gallups, a Baptist minister, pastor, author and radio talk-show host, has also devoted much time to this issue in light of the Supreme Court’s June 26 ruling. He believes the fact that homosexuality was not only practiced widely in ancient Canaan but that authorities apparently gave it their stamp of approval may well have been why God ordered the Israelites to wipe out the Canaanite society.

“Isn’t it interesting that one of the oldest known references to homosexual contracts sanctioned by a government and society references a society for which God ordered its total destruction? Not only that, but God gave the reason for its destruction as being ‘defiled’ and worthy of ‘vomiting out its inhabitants,’” said Gallups.

Powers given to the police after the 9/11 attacks on America to stop and search people without reasonable suspicion had to be scaled back after widespread misuse. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, while not confined to anti-terrorism, has been used by the police to investigate the sources for newspaper “whistle-blower” stories. Now the Government is planning a new legal crackdown on “extremist” ideology and there are calls for its remit to be extended far beyond what was thought to be its purpose. The measure will introduce Extremism Disruption Orders (EDOs) to bear down on preachers and teachers extolling the virtues of jihad and fomenting anti-Western attitudes among young Muslims.

But rather than focus on where the problem clearly lies, the Government has already blurred the edges by saying it will apply to “all extremist views”. But how are these to be defined? Mark Spencer, a Conservative MP, has proposed that a potential target for these orders could be teachers who tell children that gay marriage is “wrong”. In other words, what was until recently an orthodox, traditionalist view would be criminalised.

Mr Spencer made his remarks in a letter to a constituent in which he expressed his support for freedom of expression. In doing so, he flagged up a clear risk that this legislation could be used to shut it down. This Bill is due to come before Parliament in the autumn. Ministers have plenty of time, therefore, to ensure it is framed in such a way that such a pernicious outcome is avoided.

The latest interview was with Melissa Farrell, of Planned Parenthood of the Gulf Coast, one of the biggest Planned Parenthood affiliates in the country. When asked by the investigators about purchasing parts, and whether they could be obtained intact, she explains, “If we alter our process, and we are able to obtain intact fetal cadavers, we can make it part of the budget that any dissections are this, and splitting the specimens into different shipments is this. It’s all just a matter of line items.”

Troy Newman, of the abortion-fighting Operation Rescue and who is on the board for CMP, said, “The admission that Planned Parenthood abortionists manipulate procedures in order to better harvest organs or even intact late-term fetal cadavers for human experimentation purposes conjures images of HG Wells’ Dr Moreau. It is all clearly illegal.”

CMP spokesman David Daleiden said, "This is now the fifth member of Planned Parenthood leadership discussing payments for aborted baby parts without any connection to actual costs of so-called tissue 'donation.' Planned Parenthood's system-wide conspiracy to evade the law and make money off of aborted fetal tissue is now undeniable."

He continued, "Anyone who watches these videos knows that Planned Parenthood is engaged in barbaric practices and human rights abuses that must end. There is no reason for an organization that uses illegal abortion methods to sell baby parts and commit such atrocities against humanity to still receive over $500 million each year from taxpayers."

The teachers are starring in BBC Two's “Are Our Kids Tough Enough Chinese School” as part of a three-part documentary that begins Tuesday. Wei Zhao, who teaches Mandarin and spent 14 years working in communist Chinese, said cuts in the welfare system will mean students will be more motivated to learn. She said: “Even if they don’t work, they can get money, they don’t worry about it. But in China they can’t get these things so they know, 'I need to study hard, I need to work hard to get money to support my family'”.

"If the British Government really cut benefits down to force people to go to work they might see things in a different way." Yang Jun, a science teacher who taught in schools in Xian before moving to the UK, said: “In China we don't need classroom management skills because everyone is disciplined by nature, by families, by society. Whereas here that is the most challenging part of teaching.” She was also confused by a teenage girl who left the classroom in tears after reading reports that singer Zayn Malik had quit the boy band One Direction.

She said: “I found it difficult to understand such emotional behaviour over a pop band.” She also challenged an individualised approach to pupil learning. She said: “You have different syllabuses to suit different students' ability. We don't. We have one syllabus, one standard; you survive or you die. It's up to you.”

The resource pack, titled “My Name is Saleh”, and a video were launched at the NUT annual conference in April. Writing in the pack’s foreword, Christine Blower, the NUT general secretary, explains the project was “inspired by a union delegation visit [to the Palestinian territories] in 2013”. However, concerns have been raised that the resource pack gives a “one sided” and “divisive” view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Images in the pack’s appendix feature a Palestinian child who has been “assaulted by settlers” and the video contains a reference to “Jews” as opposed to “Israelis”. Tom Wilson, from the Henry Jackson Society, a think-tank, called the project “overtly agenda driven” and warned: "We need to be more vigilant about the politicisation of British classrooms”. “It is a particularly shameless example of political activism masquerading as a legitimate form of education,” he said.

First, it was assumed that (at least from March 2016), the Internatonal Monetary Fund (IMF) would participate. The exact amount of any further IMF loans to Greece would have to be agreed in due course, but if previous bail-outs were any guide, one might have expected the IMF involvement to be of order of 10 percent to 20 percent of the total. So the IMF would provide some €8 billion to €15 billion, with the eurozone states providing the other €70 billion or more.

Subsequently, the IMF has said it will not participate unless Greek debts are written down and unless Greece can prove itself more committed than in previous bail-out programmes to actually carrying through with reforms. That effectively means the IMF will not take part at all. There is little to no chance of the main eurozone creditors such as Germany agreeing to further write-downs of Greek debt – especially not in a context in which they are supposed to agree to provide it with a lot more.

My guess remains that the third Greek bail-out will never happen. The detailed terms will probably be rejected by both Greece and key eurozone members. Then we shall discover if Grexit really holds the terrors many claim.

According to this plan, Athens would try to bring German companies to court - who have not or have only partially been subjected to bribery investigations - to have them pay at least part of the restitution for damages caused by the alleged corruption, officially estimated in the billions. Siemens is the most famous example. A Greek parliamentary investigating committee estimated that, through systematic bribery, this Munich-based company has caused damages of two billion Euros in Greece.

However, Siemens got off cheap in an out-of-court settlement and had to pay only 270 million Euros - hardly one fifth of its current quarterly profit. A court in Munich gave a Siemens manager a suspended sentence - significantly less than what he could have expected from a trial in Athens. Already in the fall of 2014, new legal proceedings had been opened in Athens to comprehensively investigate this systematic corruption.

I find persuasive the arguments of many analysts that the proposal fails because it lifts sanctions before Iran has over time proven that it is committed to abandoning its nuclear weapons program. Perhaps even more importantly, I oppose the agreement because it does not require Iran to stop its funding of Hezbollah and other extremist hoodlums around the world.

But more fundamentally, I oppose the proposal because, while addressing strategic issues, the deal ignores a moral issue, among the most profound of our time. Put simply: Iran sponsors terrorism. I am convinced I could prove that proposition in a court of law, and indeed some Americans have done so. Survivors of terrorist attacks have sued the Iranian government in American courts, and won significant judgments.

But the Iranian government has refused to pay those judgments, and the proposed agreement does nothing to challenge that intransigence. In fact, the agreement would release up to 150 billion dollars of frozen assets to Iran, without requiring that a dime go to paying off the survivors of Iran-sponsored terror.

The sanctions must remain in place until Tehran renounces terrorism, stops funding Hezbollah, and honors judgments awarding compensation to those whose loved ones have been killed in past attacks. Can we get such a deal? In urging the nation to support the end of sanctions, the president has said that the deal he presented to Congress is the best one that could be negotiated. Others disagree. But whoever is right, one thing is certain: no agreement is worth supporting if it undermines the most basic principles that must govern relations among civilized nations.

“There is no meaningful verification,” Stein elaborated, in an opinion piece in The American Spectator. “The sanctions are already basically gone. The President is paying Iran over $100 billion to go forward with making a nuclear bomb and having the rockets to deliver it. We have basically been swindled into allowing the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons without any penalty – indeed, with cash and prizes. Iran has sworn to use these weapons to obliterate not only Israel but every Jew on earth.

“Again, this could not have been an accident. It has to have been the working out of some deep unconscious rage at Israel, Jews, and at America by the top players in this administration… many of them Jewish or, like Kerry, partly Jewish. Mr Obama has – as I have said before – now signed Israel’s death warrant.”

Only Israel can figure out some way out of it. Perhaps a miraculous anti-missile defense. Perhaps a genuine Doomsday Device which will end all life on earth if Israel is nuked. "We shall see,” Stein wound up. “In the meantime, Mr Obama is in tears that he has been criticized so harshly for an agreement that basically cries out for 'a Holocaust in an afternoon,' as Iranians smilingly call it.”